Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum at 10.2 W/mK, 45% in favour of Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Prolimatech |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | PK-1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-45% | 10.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 1.5g, 5g, 30g syringe options |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-electronically conductive, non-corrosive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-2 | Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | View on Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.