Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro at 6.0 W/mK, 7% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro. They match on electrical conductivity and recommended use.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-7% | 6.0 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | Sold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses (0.5/1.0/1.5/2.0/3.0mm) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Reusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged |
| Safety Notes | None | Cut to size with scissors; non-conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-2 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Grizzly | View on Thermal Grizzly |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK