Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-2 vs SilverStone TF01: Comparison

Arctic MX-2 and SilverStone TF01 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, SilverStone TF01 at 8.5 W/mK, 34% in favour of SilverStone TF01. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.

SilverStone TF01 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/No Separation or Leakage/Standard Mounting Paste)
SilverStoneSilverStone TF01

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-2 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Budget Legacy Compound)
Arctic MX-2
SilverStone TF01 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/No Separation or Leakage/Standard Mounting Paste)
SilverStone TF01
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedSilicone-Based
BrandArcticSilverStone
ModelArctic MX-2SilverStone TF01
Thermal Conductivity5.6 W/mK-34%8.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g, 30g, 65g1.5g/4g tube options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPUCPU/GPU Heatsink Mounting
Reapplication IntervalNot consistently publishedMarketed as resistant to separation/leakage; no fixed interval published
Safety NotesNoneNone
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste