Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut at 62.5 W/mK, 91% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Carbon Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut , Carbonaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-91% | 62.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 31x25x0.2mm / 32x32x0.2mm / 38x38x0.2mm sheets |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | High-end CPU/GPU (also consoles and frequent cooler remounts) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Reusable across multiple mounts |
| Safety Notes | None | Electrically conductive; keep clear of exposed board components and do not overhang the die edge |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Carbonaut
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro