Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme at 14.2 W/mK, 61% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme. They match on 4 other specifications, including electrical conductivity, reapplication interval and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Metal Oxide/Ceramic |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-61% | 14.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 1g, 2g, 5.55g/9g |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Extreme Overclocking, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermalright TFX