Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad TGP HC3000: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad TGP HC3000 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad TGP HC3000 at 3.0 W/mK, 65% in favour of Arctic MX-4.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Bergquist (Henkel) |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Gap Pad TGP HC3000 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 3.0 W/mK-65% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 8 x 16in sheet, 0.25mm-2mm thickness options |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | No reapplication needed; reusable silicone sheet |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-4 | Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad TGP HC3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Mouser (Datasheet) | View on Mouser (Datasheet) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad TGP HC3000
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad TGP HC3000
- Arctic MX-4 vs Zalman ZM-STC10