Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 at 6.0 W/mK, 29% in favour of Arctic MX-4.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 6.0 W/mK-29% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 120 x 120 mm sheet, 2.0 mm thickness (also sold in 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thicknesses and L/XS sizes) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Laptop-Thin-GPU (marketed for laptops, graphics cards and game consoles) |
| Safety Notes | None | Keep away from small children and pets; not for internal consumption |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0
- Arctic MX-4 vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad