Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-4 vs JunPus JP-DX1: Comparison

Arctic MX-4 and JunPus JP-DX1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, JunPus JP-DX1 at 16 W/mK, 47% in favour of JunPus JP-DX1. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
Arctic MX-4
JunPus JP-DX1 (Diamond-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano Diamond Overclocking Grease/16 W/mK)
JunPus JP-DX1
BrandArcticJunPus
ModelArctic MX-4 , MX-4JP-DX1
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK-47%16 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes3g tube; also sold in 1kg bulk
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget)High-end CPU/GPU
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-4JunPus JP-DX1
AmazonView on Amazon
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste