Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut differ on compound type: Arctic MX-4 at Carbon-Based, Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut at Metal-Oxide/Silicone Based. They match on 5 other specifications, including thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Metal-Oxide/Silicone Based |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut , Aeronaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 1g / 3.9g / 7.8g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Mainstream CPU/GPU (entry-level; also suited to consoles) |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | Wear-resistant per brand materials; exact interval to be confirmed |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Curing | Non-Curing | Non-Curing |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |