Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme at 14.2 W/mK, 40% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme. They match on 4 other specifications, including electrical conductivity, safety notes and curing.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Metal Oxide/Ceramic |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-40% | 14.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 1g, 2g, 5.55g/9g |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | Extreme Overclocking, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Curing | Non-Curing | Non-Curing |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad