Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Thermalright TFX: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Thermalright TFX separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermalright TFX at 14.3 W/mK, 41% in favour of Thermalright TFX. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Thermalright |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | TFX |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-41% | 14.3 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | 2g and 6.2g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Electrically non-conductive, harmless per manufacturer |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-4 | Thermalright TFX |
|---|---|---|
| Thermalright (Manufacturer) | View on Thermalright (Manufacturer) | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-4 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-4 vs T-Global Technology T-Global TG-A1450 Ultra Soft Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermalright TFX




