Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-4 vs Thermalright TFX: Comparison

Arctic MX-4 and Thermalright TFX separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermalright TFX at 14.3 W/mK, 41% in favour of Thermalright TFX. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Thermalright TFX (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/Flagship TF-Series Paste/14.3 W/mK)
ThermalrightThermalright TFX

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
Arctic MX-4
Thermalright TFX (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/Flagship TF-Series Paste/14.3 W/mK)
Thermalright TFX
BrandArcticThermalright
ModelArctic MX-4 , MX-4TFX
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK-41%14.3 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes2g and 6.2g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget)High-end CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNoneElectrically non-conductive, harmless per manufacturer
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-4Thermalright TFX
Thermalright (Manufacturer)View on Thermalright (Manufacturer)
AmazonView on Amazon

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste