Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Corsair XTM70: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Corsair XTM70 differ on compound type: Arctic MX-5 at Carbon-Based, Corsair XTM70 at Hybrid. They match on electrical conductivity, reapplication interval and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Hybrid |
| Brand | Arctic | Corsair |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | Corsair XTM70 |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 3g syringe w/ applicator stencil |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | High-end CPU/GPU, Extreme Overclocking (250W+ TDP) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | Despite "liquid metal" reputation online, confirmed non-conductive by Corsair |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK




