Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 at 6.0 W/mK, 29% in favour of Arctic MX-5.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 6.0 W/mK-29% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 120 x 120 mm sheet, 2.0 mm thickness (also sold in 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thicknesses and L/XS sizes) |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Laptop-Thin-GPU (marketed for laptops, graphics cards and game consoles) |
| Safety Notes | None | Keep away from small children and pets; not for internal consumption |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK




