Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900 at 4.8 W/mK, 44% in favour of Arctic MX-5. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | GD (Foshan High Conductivity Electronics Co., Ltd.) |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | GD900 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 4.8 W/mK-44% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 5g bag up to 30g pot |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Volume resistivity >= 1.0x10^14 ohm-cm (electrical insulator); oil separation <=1.8% |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-5 | Foshan High Conductivity Electronics (GD Brand) GD900 |
|---|---|---|
| GD (Manufacturer) | View on GD (Manufacturer) | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK