Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Honeywell PTM7950: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Honeywell PTM7950 differ on compound type: Arctic MX-5 at Carbon-Based, Honeywell PTM7950 at Phase-Change Pad. They match on thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Phase-Change Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Honeywell |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | Honeywell PTM7950 , PTM7950 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | Sheet/pad cut to size (sold by area, not weight) |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Laptop-Thin-GPU (and builds needing reapplication-free long-term use) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Rated for repeated thermal cycles without reapplication (~2+ years) |
| Safety Notes | None | Solid at room temperature; softens at operating temperature; different application method than paste |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Honeywell PTM7950
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK




