Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Innovation Cooling IC Diamond 7 Carat: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Innovation Cooling IC Diamond 7 Carat separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, Innovation Cooling IC Diamond 7 Carat at 4.5 W/mK, 47% in favour of Arctic MX-5. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Innovation Cooling |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | IC Diamond 7 Carat |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 4.5 W/mK-47% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 1.5g tube |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-conductive per manufacturer |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-5 | Innovation Cooling IC Diamond 7 Carat |
|---|---|---|
| Innovation Cooling (Manufacturer) | View on Innovation Cooling (Manufacturer) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK




