Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs PCCooler A1: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and PCCooler A1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, PCCooler A1 at 7.5 W/mK, 12% in favour of Arctic MX-5. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silver-infused compound (classification pending verification) |
| Brand | Arctic | PCCooler |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | PCCooler A1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 7.5 W/mK-12% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 2g syringe |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK




