Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad 8: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad 8 differ on compound type: Arctic MX-5 at Carbon-Based, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad 8 at Silicone-Based Pad.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad 8 |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 30x30mm, 120x20mm, and 100x100mm sheets, 0.5mm to 3.0mm thick |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Electrically insulating at 8kV/mm (ASTM D149) |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad 8