Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Halnziye HY-910i: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Halnziye HY-910i separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Halnziye HY-910i at 10.5 W/mK, 19% in favour of Halnziye HY-910i. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Halnziye HY-910i (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/Silver-Grey Grease/10.5 W/mK)
Halnziye HY-910i
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedSilicone-Based
BrandArcticHalnziye
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6Halnziye HY-910i
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK-19%10.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes1g/3g/10g/20g syringes and jars widely offered
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Mainstream CPU/GPU
Reapplication Interval8+ yearsNot consistently published
Safety NotesNoneNone
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-6Halnziye HY-910i
HalnziyeView on Halnziye

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste