Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and ID-Cooling ID-TG15 differ on compound type: Arctic MX-6 at Carbon-Based, ID-Cooling ID-TG15 at Silicone-Based. They match on thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Arctic | ID-Cooling |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | ID-TG15 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | 1.5g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK




