Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro at 6.0 W/mK, 29% in favour of Arctic MX-6.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 6.0 W/mK-29% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | Sold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses (0.5/1.0/1.5/2.0/3.0mm) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | 8+ years | Reusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged |
| Safety Notes | None | Cut to size with scissors; non-conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-6 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Grizzly | View on Thermal Grizzly |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro