Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad at 3 W/mK, 65% in favour of Arctic MX-6.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedSilicone-Based Pad
BrandArcticWakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette)
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6PL-1-3-1016-H
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK3 W/mK-65%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes101.6 x 101.6 x 1mm sheet
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling
Reapplication Interval8+ yearsNo reapplication needed; reusable silicone sheet
Safety NotesNoneNon-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-6Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
AmazonView on Amazon
Wakefield ThermalView on Wakefield Thermal

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste