Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic Silver 5 vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm: Comparison
Arctic Silver 5 and EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic Silver 5 at 8.9 W/mK, EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm at 3.5 W/mK, 61% in favour of Arctic Silver 5.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.9 W/mK | 3.5 W/mK-61% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 3.5g syringe (also 12g) | Type G, 120 x 24 x 2.0mm |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU | High-end CPU/GPU (replacement pad for EK full-cover water blocks) |
| Safety Notes | Requires ~200-hour burn-in period to reach rated performance | Flame rating V-0; dielectric breakdown voltage >4kV; volume resistance >10^11 Ohm-m; natural tack on one side only, remove protective foil before installation |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic Silver 5 | EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm |
|---|---|---|
| Titan Rig | View on Titan Rig |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-1 vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm
- Alphacool Silver Grease Thermal Paste vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm
- Arctic MX-7 vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm