Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic Silver 5 vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m: Comparison

Arctic Silver 5 and Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic Silver 5 at 8.9 W/mK, Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m at 17 W/mK, 48% in favour of Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m.

Specs

Specification
Arctic Silver 5 (Metal-Based/Non-Conductive/8.9 W/mK/200-Hour Cure Period)
Arctic Silver 5
Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17 W/mK)
Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
Compound TypeMetal-BasedSilicone-Based Pad
BrandArctic SilverFujipoly
ModelArctic Silver 5Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m , Ultra Extreme XR-m
Thermal Conductivity8.9 W/mK-48%17 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size3.5g syringe (also 12g)100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thickness
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPUHigh-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling)
Reapplication IntervalPeriodic reapplication recommended due to curing/drying behaviorLong-term stable, not a wear item
Safety NotesRequires ~200-hour burn-in period to reach rated performanceNone
Pump-Out ResistanceMediumHigh
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad
Spec Score6.06.6

More comparisons in Thermal Paste