Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic Silver 5 vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15: Comparison
Arctic Silver 5 and ID-Cooling ID-TG15 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic Silver 5 at 8.9 W/mK, ID-Cooling ID-TG15 at 8.5 W/mK, 4% in favour of Arctic Silver 5. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Arctic Silver | ID-Cooling |
| Model | Arctic Silver 5 | ID-TG15 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.9 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-4% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 3.5g syringe (also 12g) | 1.5g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Arctic Silver 5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15




