Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Arctic MX-5: Comparison
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Arctic MX-5 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, 65% in favour of Arctic MX-5.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Acrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer) | Carbon-Based |
| Brand | 3M | Arctic |
| Model | 5590H | Arctic MX-5 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 3 W/mK-65% | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs) | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers |
| Reapplication Interval | No reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time application | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | Non-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions required | None |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H | Arctic MX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newark | View on Newark |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs EK-Quantum Vector³ RTX 5080/90 Thermal Pad Kit
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs CS Labs (Computer Systems, Greece) CS Labs K5-Pro