Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool EX750: Comparison
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Deepcool EX750 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Deepcool EX750 at 6.2 W/mK, 52% in favour of Deepcool EX750.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 3 W/mK-52% | 6.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs) | 3 g grease weight |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling | High-end CPU/GPU (marketed as "enthusiast grade" for desktop and laptop CPUs/GPUs) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H | Deepcool EX750 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newark | View on Newark |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs EK-Quantum Vector³ RTX 5080/90 Thermal Pad Kit
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs CS Labs (Computer Systems, Greece) CS Labs K5-Pro
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455