Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Odyssey: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermalright Odyssey separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermalright Odyssey at 12.8 W/mK, 77% in favour of Thermalright Odyssey. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermalright Odyssey (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/12.8 W/mK)
Thermalright Odyssey
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silicone-Based Pad
Brand3MThermalright
Model5590HThermalright Odyssey , Odyssey
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-77%12.8 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)85x45mm (0.5/1.0/1.5/2.0mm), also 120x120mm and 120x20mm sheets
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU (GPU, RAM and SSD gap-filling)
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationLong-term stable, not a wear item
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HThermalright Odyssey
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste