Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs JunPus JP-DX1: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and JunPus JP-DX1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, JunPus JP-DX1 at 16 W/mK, 31% in favour of JunPus JP-DX1.

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
JunPus JP-DX1 (Diamond-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano Diamond Overclocking Grease/16 W/mK)
JunPus JP-DX1
BrandAlphacoolJunPus
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKJP-DX1
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK-31%16 W/mK
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on3g tube; also sold in 1kg bulk
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsHigh-end CPU/GPU
ConsistencyManufacturer describes it as clinging closely to components similarly to a paste, and drying out more slowly than standard thermal padsViscosity ~3,000,000 mPa.s per independent teardown
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mKJunPus JP-DX1
AmazonView on Amazon
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste