Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20: Comparison

Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20 at 2.4 W/mK, 78% in favour of Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK.

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK (Pad/95x32x0.5mm)
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK
Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/2.4 W/mK)
Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20
BrandAlphacoolBergquist (Henkel)
ModelAlphacool Eisschicht 11W/mKGap Pad 2500S20
Thermal Conductivity11.0 W/mK2.4 W/mK-78%
Package Size95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on8 x 16in reinforced sheet, multiple thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level componentsMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling
ConsistencyManufacturer describes it as clinging closely to components similarly to a paste, and drying out more slowly than standard thermal padsReinforced (fiberglass-supported) soft silicone sheet
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

RetailerAlphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mKBergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20
AmazonView on Amazon
MouserView on Mouser

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste