Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut: Comparison
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut at 8.5 W/mK, 23% in favour of Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Eisschicht 11W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut , Aeronaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11.0 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-23% |
| Package Size | 95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on | 1g / 3.9g / 7.8g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level components | Mainstream CPU/GPU (entry-level; also suited to consoles) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20




