Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-6: Comparison

Alphacool Subzero and Arctic MX-6 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, 47% in favour of Alphacool Subzero. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Subzero (High-Performance Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/16 W/mK)
Alphacool Subzero
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Compound TypeHigh-Performance Silicone-BasedCarbon-Based
BrandAlphacoolArctic
ModelAlphacool Subzero , SubzeroArctic MX-6 , MX-6
Thermal Conductivity16 W/mK8.5 W/mK-47%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes
Recommended UseHigh-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking)Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)
Reapplication IntervalVerify manufacturer-rated interval8+ years
Safety NotesNoneNone
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste