Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad at 11.0 W/mK, 31% in favour of Alphacool Subzero. They match on electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Silicone-Based (Solid Pad) |
| Brand | Alphacool | Fujipoly |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK | 11.0 W/mK-31% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 100x15mm and similar sheets, multiple thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Solid sheet avoids pump-out by design |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic Silver Ceramique 2 vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad