Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad at 11.0 W/mK, 73% in favour of Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/11.0 W/mK/Cuttable Universal Filler)
Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silicone-Based (Solid Pad)
Brand3MFujipoly
Model5590HFujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-73%11.0 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)100x15mm and similar sheets, multiple thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingGPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationSolid sheet avoids pump-out by design
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HFujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste