Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m at 17 W/mK, 6% in favour of Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m. They match on electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | High-Performance Silicone-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Alphacool | Fujipoly |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m , Ultra Extreme XR-m |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK-6% | 17 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 100x15mm and 60x50mm sheets, 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thickness |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | High-end CPU/GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and console cooling) |
| Reapplication Interval | Verify manufacturer-rated interval | Long-term stable, not a wear item |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Fujipoly Ultra Extreme XR-m
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Subzero vs Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad