Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm: Comparison

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm at 3.5 W/mK, 68% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond.

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
AntecAntec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm (120x16mm) (Aluminum-Oxide/Metal-Oxide/Non-Conductive/Reusable Water Block Replacement Pad)
EKEK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm

Specs

Specification
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm (120x16mm) (Aluminum-Oxide/Metal-Oxide/Non-Conductive/Reusable Water Block Replacement Pad)
EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
Thermal Conductivity11 W/mK3.5 W/mK-68%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g syringeType F, 120 x 16 x 1.5mm
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers)High-end CPU/GPU (replacement pad for EK full-cover water blocks)
Safety NotesNoneFlame rating V-0; dielectric breakdown voltage >4kV; volume resistance >10^11 Ohm-m; natural tack on one side only, remove protective foil before installation
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerAntec Formula 7 Nano DiamondEK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
Titan RigView on Titan Rig

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste