Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Gelid GC-2: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Gelid GC-2 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Gelid GC-2 at 3.9 W/mK, 65% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity, reapplication interval and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Metal Oxide/Ceramic |
| Brand | Antec | Gelid |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Gelid GC-2 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 3.9 W/mK-65% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 3.5g/7g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | Largely discontinued at retail; verify stock freshness |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad