Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Noctua NT-H2: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Noctua NT-H2 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Noctua NT-H2 at 9.0 W/mK, 18% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Metal-Oxide (no metallic particles) |
| Brand | Antec | Noctua |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Noctua NT-H2 , NT-H2 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 9.0 W/mK-18% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 1.4g / 3.5g / 10g tubes (includes cleaning wipes) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Long-term stable per Noctua testing (rated up to 5 years) |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H2
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Zalman ZM-STC10