Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum at 10.2 W/mK, 7% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antec | Prolimatech |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | PK-2 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 10.2 W/mK-7% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 1.5g, 5g, 30g syringe options |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Dielectric strength 4 KV/mm, non-electronically conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | View on Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad