Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs SilverStone TF01: Comparison

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and SilverStone TF01 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, SilverStone TF01 at 8.5 W/mK, 23% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
AntecAntec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
SilverStone TF01 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/No Separation or Leakage/Standard Mounting Paste)
SilverStoneSilverStone TF01

Specs

Specification
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
SilverStone TF01 (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/No Separation or Leakage/Standard Mounting Paste)
SilverStone TF01
Compound TypeCarbon-Based (Nano-Diamond)Silicone-Based
BrandAntecSilverStone
ModelAntec Formula 7 Nano DiamondSilverStone TF01
Thermal Conductivity11 W/mK8.5 W/mK-23%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g syringe1.5g/4g tube options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers)CPU/GPU Heatsink Mounting
Reapplication IntervalNot consistently publishedMarketed as resistant to separation/leakage; no fixed interval published
Safety NotesNoneNone
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste