Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs StarTech SILVGREASE1: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and StarTech SILVGREASE1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, StarTech SILVGREASE1 at 3.195 W/mK, 71% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on 4 other specifications, including electrical conductivity, reapplication interval and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Metal Oxide/Ceramic-Silicone |
| Brand | Antec | StarTech |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | StarTech SILVGREASE1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 3.195 W/mK-71% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 1.5g re-sealable syringe (also 5-pack, 20g tube) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | IT Technician/Reseller CPU-GPU Servicing |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs StarTech SILVGREASE1
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE