Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut at 7.8 W/mK, 29% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Silicone-Based (silicone/metal-oxide) |
| Brand | Antec | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut , Hydronaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 7.8 W/mK-29% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 3.9g / 7.8g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (upper-mid builds; suited to large cooling surfaces such as PS4/PS5/Xbox) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-1 vs Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut