Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut at 12.5 W/mK, 12% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Antec | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut , Kryonaut |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-12% | 12.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 1g / 5.55g / 11.1g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | 1-2 years typical |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45