Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet: Comparison

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet at 40.7 W/mK, 73% in favour of Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet.

Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
AntecAntec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet (Graphene Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~40.7 W/mK)
Thermal GrizzlyThermal Grizzly KryoSheet

Specs

Specification
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/Nano-Diamond Blend/Mess-Free Application)
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet (Graphene Pad/Conductive/Reusable/Commonly Cited ~40.7 W/mK)
Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
Compound TypeCarbon-Based (Nano-Diamond)Graphene Pad
BrandAntecThermal Grizzly
ModelAntec Formula 7 Nano DiamondThermal Grizzly KryoSheet , KryoSheet
Thermal Conductivity11 W/mK-73%40.7 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingConductive
Package Size4g syringe24x12mm to 50x50mm sheets, 0.2mm thick
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers)High-end CPU/GPU (high-wattage GPUs especially)
Reapplication IntervalNot consistently publishedReusable across multiple mounts
Safety NotesNoneElectrically conductive; keep clear of exposed board components
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

More comparisons in Thermal Paste