Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20 at 2.4 W/mK, 57% in favour of Arctic MX-2.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Bergquist (Henkel) |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | Gap Pad 2500S20 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK | 2.4 W/mK-57% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 8 x 16in reinforced sheet, multiple thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | No reapplication needed; reusable reinforced silicone sheet |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-2 | Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Mouser | View on Mouser |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20