Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 at 6.0 W/mK, 7% in favour of Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-7% | 6.0 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 120 x 120 mm sheet, 2.0 mm thickness (also sold in 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thicknesses and L/XS sizes) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Laptop-Thin-GPU (marketed for laptops, graphics cards and game consoles) |
| Safety Notes | None | Keep away from small children and pets; not for internal consumption |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermalright TFX
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro