Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm at 3.5 W/mK, 37% in favour of Arctic MX-2.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK | 3.5 W/mK-37% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | Type F, 120 x 16 x 1.5mm |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | High-end CPU/GPU (replacement pad for EK full-cover water blocks) |
| Safety Notes | None | Flame rating V-0; dielectric breakdown voltage >4kV; volume resistance >10^11 Ohm-m; natural tack on one side only, remove protective foil before installation |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-2 | EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm |
|---|---|---|
| Titan Rig | View on Titan Rig |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro