Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-2 vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme: Comparison
Arctic MX-2 and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-2 at 5.6 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme at 73 W/mK, 92% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Liquid Metal |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-2 | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme , Conductonaut Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 5.6 W/mK-92% | 73 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive |
| Package Size | 4g, 30g, 65g | 1g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU | Delidded-Direct-Die (GPU and vertical mounting) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Long-lasting once applied |
| Safety Notes | None | Liquid metal: electrically conductive; do not use near exposed aluminum or bare-die edges |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Arctic MX-2 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-2 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-2 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-2 vs Thermalright TFX
- Arctic MX-2 vs PCCooler EX90