Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-4 vs Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum: Comparison

Arctic MX-4 and Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum at 10.2 W/mK, 17% in favour of Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
ArcticArctic MX-4
Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum (Aluminum Nano-Particle/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Compound/10.2 W/mK)
ProlimatechProlimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-4 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Proven Budget Legacy Pick/98,000+ Positive Reviews)
Arctic MX-4
Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum (Aluminum Nano-Particle/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Compound/10.2 W/mK)
Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum
BrandArcticProlimatech
ModelArctic MX-4 , MX-4PK-2
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK-17%10.2 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes1.5g, 5g, 30g syringe options
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget)Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNoneDielectric strength 4 KV/mm, non-electronically conductive
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-4Prolimatech PK-2 Nano Aluminum
Prolimatech (Manufacturer)View on Prolimatech (Manufacturer)
AmazonView on Amazon

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste