Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-4 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme: Comparison
Arctic MX-4 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-4 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme at 12.5 W/mK, 32% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Arctic MX-4 , MX-4 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-32% | 12.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g / 8g / 20g / 45g tubes | Sold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (builds on a tight budget) | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Up to 8 years | Reusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged |
| Safety Notes | None | Cut to size with scissors; non-conductive |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-4 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Grizzly | View on Thermal Grizzly |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.